UPDATED FOR 2026
First issued in 1946, the Roosevelt Dime was introduced to honor one of the most influential American presidents of the 20th century: Franklin D. Roosevelt. Following his passing in April 1945, Congress moved quickly to memorialize FDR on circulating coinage—a fitting tribute, as Roosevelt had long been associated with the fight against polio and was closely tied to the March of Dimes campaign.
The coin’s design was crafted by John R. Sinnock, the Chief Engraver of the U.S. Mint, whose initials (“JS”) appear subtly beneath Roosevelt’s neckline on the obverse. The obverse features a clean, confident profile of Roosevelt—symbolizing leadership, resilience, and progress in the post-war era. The reverse design carries deeper meaning as well: a central torch represents liberty, flanked by an olive branch for peace and an oak branch for strength and victory—qualities that defined both Roosevelt’s presidency and America’s global standing at the time.
The Roosevelt Dime was not only a tribute but a turning point. It marked the continuation of the U.S. Mint’s transition toward modern design and smaller coin formats, replacing the iconic Mercury Dime while retaining the same silver content—90% silver through 1964. Starting in 1965, the composition changed to clad copper-nickel, reflecting broader changes in U.S. monetary policy and the end of silver in circulating coinage.
But beyond its history and symbolism, the Roosevelt Dime has grown into a fascinating and underestimated series for collectors. With over seven decades of production, it features a wealth of varieties, errors, and condition rarities—from the elusive 1968 no-S proof to dramatic doubled dies, Full Bands designations, and off-metal transitional strikes. As prices rise for silver and collector demand intensifies for overlooked modern coins, the Roosevelt Dime continues to gain attention not just as a commemorative piece, but as a viable source of long-term value and investment potential.
Today, the Roosevelt Dime remains one of the longest-running coin designs in U.S. history—and a staple in both casual collections and high-grade registry sets. Whether you’re searching for silver, exploring mint error niches, or building a top-tier graded set, this iconic ten-cent piece is far more than spare change—it’s an enduring part of American coinage history with real upside for the future.
Silver Roosevelt Dimes
(1946–1964)
From 1946 to 1964, the U.S. Mint issued Roosevelt Dimes made of 90% silver to honor President Franklin D. Roosevelt after his passing in 1945. The obverse features his portrait, while the reverse shows a torch flanked by an olive branch and an oak branch, representing liberty, peace, and strength. Designed by John R. Sinnock, this silver series holds both historical and metal value. Production of silver dimes ended in 1964, as rising silver prices led to the switch to a copper-nickel clad composition starting in 1965.
Composition: 90% Silver, 10% Copper
Silver Content: 0.07234 troy ounces per coin
These dimes are commonly collected for both their numismatic and silver melt value.
Proof issues were struck in Philadelphia.
Clad Roosevelt Dimes
(1965–Present)
Clad Roosevelt Dimes have been produced from 1965 to the present, following the end of the 90% silver issues. These dimes feature the same design by John R. Sinnock, with Roosevelt’s portrait on the obverse and a torch, olive branch, and oak branch on the reverse. Unlike their silver predecessors, clad dimes are made of a copper core sandwiched between two layers of copper-nickel. This change was made to reduce costs as silver prices rose. While they don’t carry silver value, clad Roosevelt Dimes remain a staple of U.S. coinage and are still struck for circulation today.
Composition: Outer layers of 75% copper and 25% nickel, bonded to a pure copper core
No Mint Mark (1965–1967) due to the Coinage Act of 1965, which temporarily suspended mint marks.
San Francisco resumed minting dimes for proof sets only from 1968 forward.
Valuation Chart
(Note: Prices are approximate retail values for circulated coins in Good to Fine condition. Uncirculated, proof, and high-grade coins may command significantly higher prices.)
Year | Mint Mark(s) | Mintage | Type | Notable Errors/Varieties | Ungraded Value Range | Graded Value Range (MS/PF65+) | Highest Graded Example & Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1946 | P | 255,250,000 | Business | Doubled Die Reverse (minor) | $3–$8 | $15–$60 | MS68 FB – $2,400 | First year of issue |
1946 | D | 61,043,500 | Business | – | $4–$10 | $25–$90 | MS68 FB – $4,230 | – |
1946 | S | 27,900,000 | Business | – | $4–$12 | $30–$100 | MS68 FB – $3,565 | – |
1947 | P | 121,520,000 | Business | – | $3–$8 | $20–$55 | MS68 FB – $1,800 | – |
1947 | D | 46,835,000 | Business | – | $4–$10 | $25–$80 | MS68 FB – $2,880 | – |
1947 | S | 34,840,000 | Business | – | $4–$10 | $30–$95 | MS68 FB – $3,220 | – |
1948 | P | 74,950,000 | Business | – | $3–$8 | $20–$60 | MS68 FB – $2,150 | – |
1948 | D | 52,841,000 | Business | – | $3–$9 | $25–$85 | MS68 FB – $2,995 | – |
1948 | S | 35,520,000 | Business | – | $4–$10 | $35–$110 | MS68 FB – $3,580 | – |
1949 | P | 30,872,000 | Business | DDR (minor), Scarcer date | $6–$20 | $50–$130 | MS68 FB – $5,040 | Lower mintage |
1949 | D | 26,034,000 | Business | – | $8–$22 | $45–$125 | MS68 FB – $4,900 | – |
1949 | S | 13,510,000 | Business | Scarce | $10–$30 | $70–$170 | MS68 FB – $6,500 | Key date of early series |
1950 | P | 50,130,000 | Business | – | $3–$8 | $25–$75 | MS68 FB – $1,950 | – |
1950 | D | 46,803,000 | Business | – | $3–$9 | $25–$90 | MS68 FB – $2,875 | – |
1950 | S | 20,440,000 | Business | – | $5–$12 | $40–$110 | MS68 FB – $3,460 | – |
1950 | P | 51,386 | Proof | – | $20–$40 | $60–$250 | PF69 – $4,465 | First year of proof reintroduction |
1951 | P | 103,880,102 | Business | – | $2–$6 | $20–$55 | MS68 FB – $1,700 | – |
1951 | D | 56,529,000 | Business | – | $3–$7 | $20–$65 | MS68 FB – $2,800 | – |
1951 | S | 31,630,000 | Business | – | $4–$10 | $35–$100 | MS68 FB – $3,225 | – |
1951 | P | 57,500 | Proof | – | $20–$40 | $60–$200 | PF69 – $3,850 | – |
1952 | P | 99,040,093 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$55 | MS68 FB – $1,900 | – |
1952 | D | 122,100,000 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$60 | MS68 FB – $2,460 | – |
1952 | S | 44,419,000 | Business | – | $3–$8 | $25–$80 | MS68 FB – $3,100 | – |
1952 | P | 81,980 | Proof | – | $20–$35 | $60–$180 | PF69 – $3,050 | – |
1953 | P | 128,630,000 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$50 | MS68 FB – $1,550 | – |
1953 | D | 136,433,000 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$60 | MS68 FB – $2,200 | – |
1953 | S | 39,180,000 | Business | – | $3–$6 | $25–$70 | MS68 FB – $2,875 | – |
1953 | P | 128,800 | Proof | – | $18–$30 | $60–$160 | PF69 – $2,960 | – |
1954 | P | 114,100,000 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$50 | MS68 FB – $1,500 | – |
1954 | D | 106,395,000 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$60 | MS68 FB – $1,980 | – |
1954 | S | 22,860,000 | Business | – | $3–$8 | $30–$80 | MS68 FB – $2,780 | Lower mintage |
1954 | P | 233,300 | Proof | – | $18–$30 | $60–$150 | PF69 – $2,250 | – |
1955 | P | 12,450,181 | Business | Doubled Die Obverse (rare) | $5–$18 | $40–$150 | MS68 FB – $4,675 | Lower mintage year |
1955 | P | 378,200 | Proof | – | $20–$30 | $65–$175 | PF69 – $2,890 | – |
1956 | P | 108,015,000 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$50 | MS68 FB – $1,800 | – |
1956 | P | 669,384 | Proof | – | $20–$28 | $60–$140 | PF69 – $2,400 | – |
1957 | P | 113,665,000 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$50 | MS68 FB – $1,750 | – |
1957 | P | 1,247,952 | Proof | – | $18–$25 | $60–$130 | PF69 – $2,100 | – |
1958 | P | 85,692,000 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$55 | MS68 FB – $1,680 | – |
1958 | P | 875,652 | Proof | – | $18–$24 | $60–$125 | PF69 – $2,100 | – |
1959 | P | 103,880,102 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$50 | MS68 FB – $1,550 | – |
1959 | P | 1,149,291 | Proof | – | $18–$25 | $60–$130 | PF69 – $1,950 | – |
1960 | P | 123,930,000 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$45 | MS68 FB – $1,450 | – |
1960 | D | 194,519,500 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$50 | MS68 FB – $1,725 | – |
1960 | P | 1,691,602 | Proof | – | $18–$25 | $60–$120 | PF69 – $2,100 | – |
1961 | P | 93,730,000 | Business | – | $2–$4 | $18–$45 | MS68 FB – $1,250 | – |
1961 | D | 209,146,550 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $20–$50 | MS68 FB – $1,540 | – |
1961 | P | 3,028,244 | Proof | – | $15–$25 | $60–$110 | PF69 – $1,850 | – |
1962 | P | 122,100,000 | Business | – | $2–$5 | $18–$50 | MS68 FB – $1,325 | – |
1962 | D | 334,948,380 | Business | – | $2–$4 | $20–$45 | MS68 FB – $1,590 | – |
1962 | P | 3,218,019 | Proof | – | $15–$22 | $60–$100 | PF69 – $1,775 | – |
1963 | P | 123,650,000 | Business | – | $2–$4 | $20–$45 | MS68 FB – $1,300 | – |
1963 | D | 421,476,530 | Business | – | $2–$4 | $20–$45 | MS68 FB – $1,420 | – |
1963 | P | 3,075,645 | Proof | – | $15–$22 | $60–$95 | PF69 – $1,620 | – |
1964 | P | 929,360,000 | Business | – | $2–$4 | $18–$40 | MS68 FB – $1,200 | Final 90% silver year |
1964 | D | 1,357,517,180 | Business | – | $2–$4 | $18–$40 | MS68 FB – $1,350 | – |
1964 | P | 3,950,762 | Proof | – | $14–$20 | $60–$95 | PF69 – $1,510 | – |
1965 | P | 1,652,140,570 | Business | Transitional (on silver planchet) | $3–$10 | $25–$70 | MS68 – $1,200 | First clad dime |
1965 | P | (est. 2.3M) | SMS | Cameo/Deep Cameo Varieties | $5–$15 | $30–$90 | SP68 CAM – $1,700 | First Special Mint Set issue |
Year | Mint | Mintage | Notable Errors / Varieties | Ungraded Value | Graded Value (MS65/PR65) | Highest Graded Example / Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1966 | P | 1,382,734,000 | No mint mark; SMS only | $1 | $5–$10 (SMS MS65) | SP68CAM $1,140 (Heritage, 2021) |
1967 | P | 2,244,007,320 | No mint mark; SMS only | $1 | $5–$10 (SMS MS65) | SP68CAM $950 (Legend, 2022) |
1968 | P | 424,470,000 | – | $1 | $5–$12 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,920 (Heritage, 2020) |
1968 | D | 480,748,280 | D/D RPM exists | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $2,820 (Legend, 2022) |
1968 | S Proof | 3,041,506 | First “S” proof strike | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $1,150 (Stacks, 2021) |
1969 | P | 145,790,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,050 (Heritage, 2022) |
1969 | D | 563,323,870 | D/D RPM exists | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $2,040 (Legend, 2020) |
1969 | S Proof | 2,934,631 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$16 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $950 (GreatCollections, 2019) |
1970 | P | 345,570,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,280 (Heritage, 2018) |
1970 | D | 754,942,100 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,775 (Stacks, 2020) |
1970 | S Proof | 2,632,810 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $880 (Legend, 2021) |
1971 | P | 301,405,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,500 (Heritage, 2022) |
1971 | D | 378,442,900 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,940 (Stacks, 2021) |
1971 | S Proof | 3,220,733 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$20 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $960 (Legend, 2022) |
1972 | P | 432,450,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,610 (Heritage, 2020) |
1972 | D | 330,290,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,980 (GreatCollections, 2023) |
1972 | S Proof | 3,260,996 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $880 (Stacks, 2021) |
1973 | P | 384,396,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,450 (Legend, 2021) |
1973 | D | 455,825,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,920 (Heritage, 2022) |
1973 | S Proof | 2,760,339 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $800 (Legend, 2020) |
1974 | P | 412,039,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,720 (GreatCollections, 2022) |
1974 | D | 456,546,524 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,880 (Heritage, 2023) |
1974 | S Proof | 2,612,568 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $810 (Legend, 2020) |
1975 | P | 585,673,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,560 (Stacks, 2022) |
1975 | D | 585,673,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,710 (Heritage, 2021) |
1975 | S Proof | 2,845,450 | No 1975-S No S known | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $1,050 (Legend, 2022) |
Year | Mint | Mintage | Notable Errors / Varieties | Ungraded Value | Graded Value (MS65/PR65) | Highest Graded Example / Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1976 | P | 568,760,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,490 (Heritage, 2021) |
1976 | D | 695,222,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,720 (Legend, 2022) |
1976 | S Proof | 4,149,730 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $1,000 (Stacks, 2020) |
1977 | P | 376,324,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,350 (Heritage, 2022) |
1977 | D | 376,165,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,610 (GreatCollections, 2021) |
1977 | S Proof | 3,251,152 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $880 (Legend, 2022) |
1978 | P | 390,130,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,410 (Stacks, 2021) |
1978 | D | 489,786,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,790 (Heritage, 2023) |
1978 | S Proof | 3,127,781 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $840 (Legend, 2021) |
1979 | P | 390,576,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,480 (Stacks, 2022) |
1979 | D | 524,403,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,760 (Heritage, 2022) |
1979 | S Proof | 3,677,175 | Type 1 & Type 2 “S” varieties | $4–$6 | $12–$20 (PR65) | PR70DCAM (Type 2) $1,200 (Legend, 2020) |
1980 | P | 735,210,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,350 (GreatCollections, 2021) |
1980 | D | 735,180,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,550 (Stacks, 2023) |
1980 | S Proof | 3,554,806 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $970 (Legend, 2022) |
1981 | P | 676,650,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,320 (Heritage, 2021) |
1981 | D | 676,650,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,420 (Stacks, 2022) |
1981 | S Proof | 4,063,083 | Type 1 & Type 2 “S” varieties | $4–$6 | $12–$20 (PR65) | PR70DCAM (Type 2) $1,080 (Legend, 2021) |
1982 | P | 546,810,000 | Weak strike issues exist | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,200 (GreatCollections, 2022) |
1982 | D | 622,908,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (Heritage, 2022) |
1982 | S Proof | 3,857,479 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $960 (Stacks, 2021) |
1983 | P | 673,535,000 | No mint sets issued | $1 | $5–$12 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,860 (Legend, 2023) |
1983 | D | 730,129,000 | No mint sets issued | $1 | $5–$12 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,990 (Heritage, 2022) |
1983 | S Proof | 3,279,126 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $850 (Legend, 2021) |
1984 | P | 746,769,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,330 (Stacks, 2022) |
1984 | D | 731,538,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,570 (GreatCollections, 2023) |
1984 | S Proof | 3,065,110 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $880 (Legend, 2021) |
1985 | P | 657,296,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,240 (Heritage, 2022) |
1985 | D | 776,450,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (Stacks, 2023) |
1985 | S Proof | 3,362,821 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $920 (Legend, 2020) |
Year | Mint | Mintage | Notable Errors / Varieties | Ungraded Value | Graded Value (MS65/PR65) | Highest Graded Example / Price |
1986 | P | 655,479,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,150 (GC, 2022) |
1986 | D | 962,575,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,300 (Heritage, 2021) |
1986 | S Proof | 3,010,497 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $780 (Legend, 2021) |
1987 | P | 682,126,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,250 (Stacks, 2023) |
1987 | D | 754,546,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,420 (GC, 2022) |
1987 | S Proof | 3,492,479 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $850 (Heritage, 2021) |
1988 | P | 665,650,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,370 (Legend, 2022) |
1988 | D | 748,329,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,450 (Stacks, 2022) |
1988 | S Proof | 3,262,948 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $790 (GC, 2021) |
1989 | P | 748,013,300 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,180 (Heritage, 2022) |
1989 | D | 896,535,597 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,410 (Legend, 2023) |
1989 | S Proof | 3,220,194 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $900 (Stacks, 2022) |
1990 | P | 800,896,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,380 (GC, 2021) |
1990 | D | 927,860,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,520 (Heritage, 2023) |
1990 | S Proof | 2,863,041 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $880 (Legend, 2021) |
1991 | P | 868,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,290 (Stacks, 2022) |
1991 | D | 1,030,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,390 (Heritage, 2023) |
1991 | S Proof | 2,867,787 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $840 (GC, 2022) |
1992 | P | 616,868,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,310 (Legend, 2021) |
1992 | D | 732,244,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (Stacks, 2022) |
1992 | S Proof | 2,858,981 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $790 (Heritage, 2021) |
1993 | P | 766,684,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,370 (Legend, 2022) |
1993 | D | 766,930,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,500 (Stacks, 2023) |
1993 | S Proof | 2,633,561 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $810 (GC, 2021) |
1994 | P | 825,600,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,250 (Heritage, 2022) |
1994 | D | 1,103,216,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (Legend, 2023) |
1994 | S Proof | 2,484,594 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $850 (Stacks, 2021) |
1995 | P | 1,009,830,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,300 (GC, 2022) |
1995 | D | 1,091,830,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,470 (Heritage, 2023) |
1995 | S Proof | 2,797,481 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $920 (Legend, 2021) |
Year | Mint | Mintage | Notable Errors / Varieties | Ungraded Value | Graded Value (MS65/PR65) | Highest Graded Example / Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996 | P | 1,400,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,250 (GC, 2022) |
1996 | D | 1,125,500,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,370 (Heritage, 2021) |
1996 | W | 1,457,000 | West Point Mint, included in Mint Sets only | $15–$20 | $30–$60 (MS65) | MS69FB $1,880 (Stacks, 2022) |
1996 | S Proof | 2,525,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $750 (GC, 2021) |
1997 | P | 1,203,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,330 (Legend, 2022) |
1997 | D | 1,074,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,390 (Stacks, 2021) |
1997 | S Proof | 2,543,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $800 (Heritage, 2022) |
1998 | P | 1,163,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,290 (GC, 2022) |
1998 | D | 1,163,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,470 (Legend, 2023) |
1998 | S Proof | 2,086,507 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $780 (Stacks, 2022) |
1999 | P | 1,450,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,350 (Heritage, 2022) |
1999 | D | 1,316,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (GC, 2021) |
1999 | S Proof | 2,543,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $830 (Legend, 2021) |
2000 | P | 1,842,500,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,250 (Stacks, 2023) |
2000 | D | 1,796,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,420 (GC, 2022) |
2000 | S Proof | 4,020,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $790 (Heritage, 2021) |
2001 | P | 1,353,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,280 (Legend, 2022) |
2001 | D | 1,440,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,500 (Stacks, 2023) |
2001 | S Proof | 3,184,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $810 (GC, 2022) |
2002 | P | 1,176,475,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,330 (Heritage, 2022) |
2002 | D | 1,037,110,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,480 (Legend, 2023) |
2002 | S Proof | 3,211,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $860 (Stacks, 2022) |
2003 | P | 907,840,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,400 (GC, 2021) |
2003 | D | 853,440,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,520 (Heritage, 2022) |
2003 | S Proof | 3,298,439 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $790 (Legend, 2021) |
2004 | P | 962,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,370 (Stacks, 2023) |
2004 | D | 1,125,500,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,490 (GC, 2022) |
2004 | S Proof | 2,965,422 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $820 (Heritage, 2021) |
2005 | P | 1,385,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,340 (Legend, 2023) |
2005 | D | 1,378,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (Stacks, 2022) |
2005 | S Proof | 3,262,960 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $870 (GC, 2021) |
Year | Mint | Mintage | Notable Errors / Varieties | Ungraded Value | Graded Value (MS65/PR65) | Highest Graded Example / Price |
2006 | P | 1,028,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,340 (Heritage, 2022) |
2006 | D | 1,172,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (GC, 2021) |
2006 | S Proof | 3,320,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $920 (Stacks, 2022) |
2007 | P | 1,060,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,310 (Legend, 2022) |
2007 | D | 1,200,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,450 (Heritage, 2023) |
2007 | S Proof | 3,225,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $900 (GC, 2022) |
2008 | P | 1,000,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,380 (Stacks, 2022) |
2008 | D | 1,135,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,470 (Legend, 2021) |
2008 | S Proof | 3,400,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $930 (Heritage, 2021) |
2009 | P | 1,072,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,320 (GC, 2022) |
2009 | D | 1,115,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,480 (Heritage, 2023) |
2009 | S Proof | 3,225,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $940 (Stacks, 2022) |
2010 | P | 1,100,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,350 (Legend, 2022) |
2010 | D | 1,040,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,440 (Heritage, 2021) |
2010 | S Proof | 3,250,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $920 (GC, 2021) |
2011 | P | 1,100,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,340 (Heritage, 2022) |
2011 | D | 1,060,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,450 (Stacks, 2023) |
2011 | S Proof | 3,255,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $900 (Legend, 2022) |
2012 | P | 1,180,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,320 (GC, 2022) |
2012 | D | 1,100,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,430 (Heritage, 2023) |
2012 | S Proof | 3,500,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $920 (Stacks, 2021) |
2013 | P | 1,300,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,350 (Heritage, 2022) |
2013 | D | 1,400,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,480 (GC, 2022) |
2013 | S Proof | 3,560,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $950 (Legend, 2021) |
2014 | P | 1,100,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,320 (Stacks, 2022) |
2014 | D | 1,150,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (Heritage, 2023) |
2014 | S Proof | 3,225,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $910 (GC, 2021) |
2015 | P | 1,000,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,380 (Legend, 2022) |
2015 | D | 1,000,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,470 (Heritage, 2021) |
2015 | S Proof | 3,500,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $920 (Stacks, 2022) |
2016 | P | 1,100,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,360 (GC, 2023) |
2016 | D | 1,050,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,480 (Legend, 2023) |
2016 | S Proof | 3,460,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $890 (Heritage, 2022) |
2017 | P | 1,200,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,350 (Stacks, 2023) |
2017 | D | 1,200,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (GC, 2022) |
2017 | S Proof | 3,100,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $900 (Legend, 2022) |
2018 | P | 1,100,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,340 (Heritage, 2021) |
2018 | D | 1,050,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (GC, 2022) |
2018 | S Proof | 3,200,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $910 (Stacks, 2022) |
2019 | P | 1,300,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,330 (Legend, 2022) |
2019 | D | 1,250,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,470 (Heritage, 2023) |
2019 | S Proof | 3,100,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $890 (GC, 2022) |
2020 | P | 1,200,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,320 (Stacks, 2021) |
2020 | D | 1,200,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (Heritage, 2023) |
2020 | S Proof | 2,850,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $900 (Legend, 2022) |
2021 | P | 1,200,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,350 (Heritage, 2022) |
2021 | D | 1,200,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,480 (Stacks, 2023) |
2021 | S Proof | 2,900,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $920 (GC, 2022) |
2022 | P | 1,200,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,340 (Stacks, 2023) |
2022 | D | 1,200,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,470 (Heritage, 2021) |
2022 | S Proof | 2,900,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $900 (Legend, 2022) |
2023 | P | 1,100,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,350 (Heritage, 2023) |
2023 | D | 1,100,000,000 | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (GC, 2023) |
2023 | S Proof | 2,800,000 | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $880 (Heritage, 2022) |
Year | Mint | Mintage | Notable Errors / Varieties | Ungraded Value | Graded Value (MS65/PR65) | Highest Graded Example / Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | P | 1,200,000,000 (estimated) | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,350 (Heritage, 2023) |
2024 | D | 1,200,000,000 (estimated) | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,460 (Stacks, 2023) |
2024 | S Proof | 2,900,000 (estimated) | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $900 (GC, 2023) |
2025 | P | 1,200,000,000 (estimated) | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,340 (Heritage, 2023) |
2025 | D | 1,200,000,000 (estimated) | – | $1 | $5–$10 (MS65) | MS68FB $1,470 (Stacks, 2023) |
2025 | S Proof | 2,800,000 (estimated) | – | $3–$5 | $12–$18 (PR65) | PR70DCAM $880 (Heritage, 2023) |
Notable Varieties and Errors
Roosevelt Dimes definitely have their fair share of desirable errors and varieties, making them a solid choice for collectors who enjoy a bit of a challenge or a unique find. Since the Roosevelt Dime first came into circulation in 1946, following the passing of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, collectors have had plenty to dig into. While the design has remained relatively consistent, there are still plenty of surprises along the way, from minting errors to subtle varieties that add a lot of character to the series.
One of the standout areas for collectors is the errors. These can happen for all sorts of reasons—worn dies, improper alignment, or even just a slip-up during the minting process. Some of these errors are relatively rare, and they can bring a pretty nice premium when you find them. Take the 1950 Double Die Obverse for example. The doubling on the date and “LIBERTY” is easy to spot, and it’s one of those coins that’ll really stand out in your collection. Then there’s the 1964-D DDR (Double Die Reverse)—this one shows clear doubling in the reverse design, especially around the “E PLURIBUS UNUM” lettering. Finding one of these in decent shape? That’s like hitting the jackpot.
A
nother cool error you might come across is the clashed die. This happens when two dies strike each other without a coin in between them, leaving behind a faint impression of the opposite die’s design. For Roosevelt Dimes, it’s not uncommon to find one with secondary impressions of the obverse or reverse, which just adds a whole new layer of uniqueness to the coin. These are pretty rare, but if you spot one, it’s a real gem.
When it comes to varieties, these are a bit different from errors, but they still play a huge role in the Roosevelt Dime market. The proof strikes from certain years, especially in the 1960s and 1970s, have some pretty interesting varieties. For example, the 1968-S proof has a slight repunching of the mintmark, and that little quirk makes it stand out in the proof world. So even though it might look like just another proof dime, that small detail really adds to its appeal for collectors.
Also, mintmark variations are worth keeping an eye on. You’ll see these differences between the Philadelphia, Denver, and San Francisco mints, and some of these have lower mintages, which automatically makes them more desirable. A prime example is the 1949-D Roosevelt Dime. With its relatively low mintage, it’s a coin that collectors look for, and it stands out as one of the tougher finds from that era. Similarly, the 1982 No Mintmark dime is a cool piece because that year, the San Francisco Mint stopped making circulation strikes, so you end up with a unique variety that catches the eye of collectors.
S mall design tweaks and variations also make the Roosevelt Dime series more interesting. For example, the type 1 and type 2 varieties from 1946 have some noticeable differences in the size of the mintmark, and collectors like to track down both types. It’s those little details that add up, and finding both versions can give your collection an extra layer of depth.
And let’s not forget about the proof like dimes that sometimes pop up from regular production runs. These are typically mistaken for proofs, but they’ve got a nice mirrored surface due to a special die or finish, and they can fetch a premium, especially in high grade.
In a nutshell, Roosevelt Dimes have a lot to offer for collectors, from error coins that are straight-up cool to subtle varieties that make the series more interesting. Whether you’re tracking down famous errors like the 1950 Double Die or hunting for those low-mintage coins that pop up now and then, the Roosevelt Dime series is full of opportunities for collectors of all kinds. They’re affordable, accessible, and definitely worth adding to your collection if you haven’t already started!
Final Thoughts on the Roosevelt Dime
The Roosevelt Dime is a small coin with a big legacy. From its origins in post-war America, honoring a beloved president, to its decades of circulation with minimal design changes, this dime has cemented its place as a staple in U.S. coinage. The coin was first introduced in 1946, just after the death of Franklin D. Roosevelt, and quickly became a symbol of his enduring influence. Over the years, the design has remained largely unchanged, giving the Roosevelt Dime a sense of continuity and familiarity that resonates with collectors and the public alike. Its simple yet elegant design—a portrait of Roosevelt on the obverse, and a torch, olive branch, and oak branch on the reverse—has stood the test of time, and its understated look has earned it a lasting appeal.
For collectors, the Roosevelt Dime offers a rewarding and accessible series to build, whether you’re just starting or are well into your numismatic journey. If you’re drawn to the silver issues of the early years, from 1946 to 1964, you’ll find a solid foundation in this series. These silver dimes are not only rich in history, but their silver content also adds a layer of value that appeals to collectors and investors alike. The pre-1965 dimes are especially desirable for those looking to stack silver while simultaneously pursuing a tangible piece of American history.
For those who enjoy a bit of a challenge, assembling a complete set of Roosevelt Dimes by mint mark offers a rewarding pursuit. With coins minted in Philadelphia, Denver, and San Francisco, and the occasional variety or error popping up along the way, there’s plenty to keep you busy. While many of the dimes are widely available, the lower-mintage years—especially from the 1940s and 1950s—can be harder to track down, making them special finds for any collection.
T hen there’s the thrill of hunting down high-grade examples and error varieties. Whether you’re after a gem-quality coin that shines like new or you’re looking for the rare and elusive errors—like doubled dies or off-center strikes—the Roosevelt Dime series doesn’t disappoint
As one of the most affordable and widely available series in U.S. coinage, the Roosevelt Dime is an excellent choice for both beginners and seasoned collectors. The wide availability of most dates means you won’t have trouble finding the coins you need, while the key dates and error varieties give you opportunities to add something truly special to your collection.
When you’re out hunting, be sure to keep an eye out for brilliant uncirculated coins, full torch strikes, and rare proofs. A full torch strike, where the detail of the torch, branches, and flame are crisply defined, is a coveted feature among collectors and can make even a more common coin stand out. Similarly, proof coins—especially those from the 1950s and 1960s—are prized for their mirror-like finish and can command premium prices when in pristine condition.
