First minted in 1909, the Lincoln Cent —affectionately known as the penny—holds the distinction of being the longest-running coin design in American history. Introduced to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, it was the first U.S. coin to feature a real historical figure, breaking from the classical allegorical designs that had dominated U.S. coinage for over a century.
Its debut marked a seismic cultural and numismatic shift. Designed by Victor David Brenner, the original Wheat Ears reverse became an instant icon. The obverse, with Lincoln’s solemn profile, honored a president revered for his leadership during the Civil War and his enduring legacy of unity and equality. In 1959, the reverse transitioned to the Lincoln Memorial, and later, to the Union Shield in 2010—each redesign preserving the tribute to Lincoln while reflecting evolving artistic and national values.
Even today, new varieties are still being discovered—especially in shield reverse issues—while legacy errors and condition rarities from earlier decades continue to command high premiums at auction. As numismatic education spreads online and younger collectors enter the hobby, the Lincoln Cent is seeing renewed attention as a profitable and nostalgic gateway into serious collecting. Check out our Lincoln penny price guide!
Lincoln Wheat Cent
(1909–1958)
The original Lincoln Cent was introduced in 1909 to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Lincoln’s birth. Designed by Victor David Brenner, it was the first U.S. coin to feature a real person rather than a symbolic figure. The obverse featured a right-facing profile of Lincoln, while the reverse showed two stylized wheat ears and the words “ONE CENT” and “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.”
1909 V.D.B. Lincoln Cent: Brenner’s initials prominently appeared on the reverse. Due to public outcry over their size and placement, the Mint quickly removed them, creating two key varieties: 1909 V.D.B. and 1909-S V.D.B., the latter being among the most coveted in the entire series.
Composition: 1909 to 1942, the cent was made primarily of 95% copper, 5% tin and zinc.
Steel Cents: In 1943, due to wartime copper shortages, the Mint struck cents using zinc-coated steel. These coins are easily recognizable by their silvery appearance and are prone to rust if not stored properly.
Post-War Composition: After 1944, the composition returned to 95% copper until 1962.
Lincoln Memorial Reverse
(1959–2008)
T o mark the 150th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, the Mint introduced a new reverse in 1959, designed by Frank Gasparro. This design featured the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., a symbolic site of civil rights and unity. Notably, Lincoln’s statue is visible between the columns, making this coin one of the only U.S. coins to feature the same figure on both sides.
Composition: Continued in 95% copper until 1982.
Mid-1982 Transition: The Mint changed the composition mid-year to a copper-plated zinc coin (97.5% zinc, 2.5% copper), a change driven by rising copper prices. Both copper and zinc versions exist for this year and can be distinguished by weight.
Lincoln Bicentennial Series
(2009)
In 2009, to commemorate the 200th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth and the 100th anniversary of the Lincoln Cent, the United States Mint released a special series of four redesigned reverse (tails side) cents, each representing a significant stage in Lincoln’s life. This initiative was part of the Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial One Cent Program, authorized by Public Law 109-145, also known as the “Presidential $1 Coin Act of 2005.” While the obverse (heads side) continued to feature Victor David Brenner’s iconic portrait of Lincoln, unchanged since 1909, the reverses were newly designed to reflect the following key periods:
Birth and Early Childhood (Kentucky)
Formative Years (Indiana)
Professional Life (Illinois)
Presidency (Washington, D.C.)
These designs were struck for circulation and collectible sets, with some struck in the original 95% copper alloy.
Union Shield Reverse
(2010–Present)
In 2010, following the conclusion of the four special bicentennial reverse designs issued in 2009, the United States Mint introduced a new permanent reverse design for the Lincoln Cent. This modern reverse features a Union Shield—a prominent symbol of national unity—emblazoned with a horizontal scroll across its face bearing the denomination “ONE CENT.” The shield is composed of 13 vertical stripes joined by a single horizontal bar at the top, representing the original 13 states joined together to form one strong Union. The design was created by artist Lyndall Bass and sculpted by United States Mint Sculptor-Engraver Joseph Menna. The obverse of the coin still features the original Victor David Brenner portrait of Lincoln, maintaining continuity with the centennial tradition first established in 1909. The Composition continues in copper-plated zinc.
Lincoln Cent Valuation Chart
(1909–Current)
Year | Mint | Mintage | Notable Errors / Varieties | Ungraded Value | Graded Value (MS65) | Highest Graded Example / Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1909 | P | 72,698,000 | VDB (initials on reverse) | $4–$6 | $100–$150 | MS67 $70,000 (Heritage, 2022) |
1909 | S | 484,000 | VDB (initials on reverse) | $50–$100 | $500–$1,000 | MS67 $1,000,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1909 | S Proof | 420,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $50,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1910 | P | 209,000,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $4,500 (Heritage, 2020) |
1910 | D | 4,802,000 | – | $4–$6 | $20–$40 | MS67 $28,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1910 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $55,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1911 | P | 190,000,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,000 (Heritage, 2020) |
1911 | D | 1,418,000 | – | $10–$20 | $50–$100 | MS67 $24,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1911 | S Proof | 400,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $60,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1912 | P | 132,000,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,500 (Heritage, 2020) |
1912 | D | 7,486,000 | – | $5–$10 | $20–$50 | MS67 $18,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1912 | S Proof | 400,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $65,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1913 | P | 121,000,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,000 (Heritage, 2020) |
1913 | D | 4,200,000 | – | $10–$20 | $30–$50 | MS67 $12,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1913 | S Proof | 400,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $60,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1914 | P | 197,000,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,200 (Heritage, 2020) |
1914 | D | 1,193,000 | – | $10–$20 | $30–$50 | MS67 $14,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1914 | S Proof | 400,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $65,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1915 | P | 71,198,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $1,800 (Heritage, 2020) |
1915 | D | 9,530,000 | – | $5–$10 | $25–$50 | MS67 $22,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1915 | S Proof | 400,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $55,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1916 | P | 22,331,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $1,800 (Heritage, 2020) |
1916 | D | 35,419,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,500 (Heritage, 2021) |
1916 | S Proof | 450,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $70,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1917 | P | 141,000,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,300 (Heritage, 2020) |
1917 | D | 43,264,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $18,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1918 | D | 62,319,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1918 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $80,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
Year | Mint | Mintage | Notable Errors / Varieties | Ungraded Value | Graded Value (MS65) | Highest Graded Example / Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1917 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $75,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1918 | P | 181,000,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,500 (Heritage, 2020) |
1919 | P | 118,000,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,500 (Heritage, 2020) |
1919 | D | 28,180,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $14,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1919 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $85,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1920 | P | 91,500,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,000 (Heritage, 2020) |
1920 | D | 7,508,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $18,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1920 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $90,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1921 | P | 7,530,000 | – | $5–$10 | $40–$60 | MS67 $18,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1921 | D | 1,834,000 | – | $10–$20 | $50–$100 | MS67 $22,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1921 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $95,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1922 | P | 9,184,000 | Weak D | $5–$10 | $50–$80 | MS67 $24,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1922 | D | 1,400,000 | Weak D | $20–$40 | $100–$200 | MS67 $35,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1922 | S Proof | 400,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $100,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1923 | P | 124,250,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,200 (Heritage, 2020) |
1923 | D | 13,010,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $20,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1923 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $110,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1924 | P | 68,300,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,800 (Heritage, 2020) |
1924 | D | 8,680,000 | – | $10–$20 | $50–$80 | MS67 $25,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1924 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $115,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1925 | P | 97,960,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,700 (Heritage, 2020) |
1925 | D | 12,410,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $20,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1925 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $120,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1926 | P | 125,720,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,800 (Heritage, 2020) |
1926 | D | 10,430,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $21,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1926 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $125,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1927 | P | 152,710,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,600 (Heritage, 2020) |
1927 | D | 3,361,000 | – | $10–$20 | $50–$100 | MS67 $28,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1927 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $130,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1928 | P | 97,500,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,400 (Heritage, 2020) |
1928 | D | 4,620,000 | – | $10–$20 | $50–$100 | MS67 $32,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1928 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $135,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1929 | P | 73,950,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,300 (Heritage, 2020) |
1929 | D | 3,711,000 | – | $10–$20 | $50–$100 | MS67 $35,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1929 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $140,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
Year | Mint | Mintage | Notable Errors / Varieties | Ungraded Value | Graded Value (MS65) | Highest Graded Example / Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1930 | P | 43,980,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,500 (Heritage, 2021) |
1930 | D | 3,062,000 | – | $10–$20 | $50–$100 | MS67 $38,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1930 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $150,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1931 | P | 62,680,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,200 (Heritage, 2021) |
1931 | D | 1,150,000 | – | $15–$30 | $75–$150 | MS67 $42,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1931 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $155,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1932 | P | 20,900,000 | – | $1–$2 | $10–$15 | MS67 $5,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1932 | D | 1,000,000 | – | $20–$30 | $100–$150 | MS67 $50,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1932 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $160,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1933 | P | 36,500,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,400 (Heritage, 2021) |
1933 | D | 3,350,000 | – | $5–$10 | $50–$100 | MS67 $38,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1933 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $165,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1934 | P | 61,160,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,300 (Heritage, 2021) |
1934 | D | 7,030,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $28,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1934 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $170,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1935 | P | 66,220,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,500 (Heritage, 2021) |
1935 | D | 8,110,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $28,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1935 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $175,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1936 | P | 111,000,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,800 (Heritage, 2021) |
1936 | D | 10,600,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $30,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1936 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $180,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1937 | P | 84,700,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,600 (Heritage, 2021) |
1937 | D | 9,760,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $32,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1937 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $185,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1938 | P | 191,550,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,500 (Heritage, 2021) |
1938 | D | 19,030,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $35,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1938 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $190,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1939 | P | 125,900,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,200 (Heritage, 2021) |
1939 | D | 12,960,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $33,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1939 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $195,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1940 | P | 188,300,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,600 (Heritage, 2021) |
1940 | D | 28,430,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $36,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1940 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $200,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1941 | P | 119,280,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,700 (Heritage, 2021) |
1941 | D | 21,570,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $37,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1941 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $210,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1942 | P | 139,050,000 | – | $1–$2 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,800 (Heritage, 2021) |
1942 | D | 15,890,000 | – | $5–$10 | $30–$50 | MS67 $38,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1942 | S Proof | 500,000 | – | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $220,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1943 | P | 1,092,000,000 | Steel (Copper alloy replaced) | $0.50–$1 | $5–$10 | MS67 $30,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1943 | D | 191,550,000 | Steel (Copper alloy replaced) | $0.50–$1 | $5–$10 | MS67 $32,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1943 | S Proof | 500,000 | Steel (Copper alloy replaced) | $50–$100 | $200–$300 (PR65) | PR67 $230,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
Year | Mint | Mintage | Notable Errors / Varieties | Ungraded Value | Graded Value (MS65) | Highest Graded Example / Price |
1944 | P | 1,435,400,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1944 | D | 430,410,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $1,800 (Heritage, 2021) |
1944 | S | 282,200,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1944 | P Proof | 15,000 | – | $10–$15 | $40–$60 (PR65) | PR67 $4,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1945 | P | 430,600,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,200 (Heritage, 2021) |
1945 | D | 115,020,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,300 (Heritage, 2021) |
1945 | S | 85,120,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,400 (Heritage, 2021) |
1945 | P Proof | 15,000 | – | $10–$15 | $40–$60 (PR65) | PR67 $5,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1946 | P | 315,150,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,200 (Heritage, 2021) |
1946 | D | 88,700,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,500 (Heritage, 2021) |
1946 | S | 138,290,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,600 (Heritage, 2021) |
1946 | P Proof | 15,000 | – | $10–$15 | $40–$60 (PR65) | PR67 $5,500 (Heritage, 2021) |
1947 | P | 88,320,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,700 (Heritage, 2021) |
1947 | D | 65,710,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,800 (Heritage, 2021) |
1947 | S | 62,450,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1947 | P Proof | 15,000 | – | $10–$15 | $40–$60 (PR65) | PR67 $6,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1948 | P | 146,290,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,200 (Heritage, 2021) |
1948 | D | 56,230,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,300 (Heritage, 2021) |
1948 | S | 53,000,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,500 (Heritage, 2021) |
1948 | P Proof | 15,000 | – | $10–$15 | $40–$60 (PR65) | PR67 $6,500 (Heritage, 2021) |
1949 | P | 382,680,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,400 (Heritage, 2021) |
1949 | D | 93,000,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,600 (Heritage, 2021) |
1949 | S | 20,500,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,700 (Heritage, 2021) |
1949 | P Proof | 15,000 | – | $10–$15 | $40–$60 (PR65) | PR67 $7,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1950 | P | 159,130,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,800 (Heritage, 2021) |
1950 | D | 40,250,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $3,900 (Heritage, 2021) |
1950 | S | 26,310,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $4,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1950 | P Proof | 15,000 | – | $10–$15 | $40–$60 (PR65) | PR67 $7,500 (Heritage, 2021) |
1951 | P | 238,500,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $4,100 (Heritage, 2021) |
1951 | D | 44,610,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $4,200 (Heritage, 2021) |
1951 | S | 26,510,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $4,300 (Heritage, 2021) |
1951 | P Proof | 15,000 | – | $10–$15 | $40–$60 (PR65) | PR67 $8,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1952 | P | 129,000,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $4,400 (Heritage, 2021) |
1952 | D | 40,590,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $4,500 (Heritage, 2021) |
1952 | S | 17,510,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $4,600 (Heritage, 2021) |
1952 | P Proof | 15,000 | – | $10–$15 | $40–$60 (PR65) | PR67 $8,500 (Heritage, 2021) |
1953 | P | 127,700,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $4,700 (Heritage, 2021) |
1953 | D | 42,690,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $4,800 (Heritage, 2021) |
1953 | S | 18,950,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $4,900 (Heritage, 2021) |
1953 | P Proof | 15,000 | – | $10–$15 | $40–$60 (PR65) | PR67 $9,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
Year | Mint | Mintage | Notable Errors / Varieties | Ungraded Value | Graded Value (MS65) | Highest Graded Example / Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1954 | P | 71,640,050 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $1,500 (Heritage, 2020) |
1954 | D | 251,552,500 | D/S variety exists | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $2,000 (Heritage, 2019) |
1954 | S | 96,190,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67+ $2,700 (Heritage, 2020) |
1954 | P Proof | 233,300 | – | $10–$20 | $40–$70 (PR65) | PR68 RD $2,880 (Heritage, 2021) |
1955 | P | 330,958,200 | Doubled Die Obverse (rare) | $0.15–$0.30 | $10–$50 (MS65), $1K+ if DDO | MS65 DDO $24,000 (Heritage, 2018) |
1955 | D | 563,257,500 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67 $1,900 (Heritage, 2020) |
1955 | S | 44,610,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67+ $2,600 (Heritage, 2019) |
1955 | P Proof | 378,200 | – | $10–$20 | $40–$70 (PR65) | PR68 RD $3,000 (Heritage, 2021) |
1956 | P | 420,745,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67+ $1,700 (Heritage, 2020) |
1956 | D | 1,098,201,100 | RPM varieties exist | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$15 | MS67+ $2,200 (Heritage, 2021) |
1956 | P Proof | 669,384 | – | $10–$20 | $40–$70 (PR65) | PR68 RD $3,120 (Heritage, 2022) |
1957 | P | 282,540,000 | – | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67+ $1,400 (Heritage, 2021) |
1957 | D | 1,051,342,000 | RPM exists | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$15 | MS67+ $2,000 (Heritage, 2020) |
1957 | P Proof | 1,247,952 | – | $10–$20 | $40–$70 (PR65) | PR68 RD $2,760 (Heritage, 2021) |
1958 | P | 252,525,000 | Doubled Die Obverse (very rare) | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$15; DDO $3,000–$10,000+ | MS64 DDO $45,600 (Heritage, 2018) |
1958 | D | 800,953,300 | RPM exists | $0.10–$0.25 | $5–$10 | MS67+ $2,100 (Heritage, 2019) |
1958 | P Proof | 875,652 | – | $10–$20 | $40–$70 (PR65) | PR68 RD $2,900 (Heritage, 2022) |
THE END OF THE WHEAT CENT
____________________________________________
Lincoln Cents Value Chart
(1959 – Current)
We will expand our price guide for this section of Lincoln cents to cover multiple grade/ condition levels, since these are seen more “often” than wheat cents and are sold vastly on the market.
Date | Mint Mark | Mintage | Good (G4) | Fine (F12) | Extremely Fine (EF40) | About Uncirculated (AU50) | Mint State (MS63) | Proof/MS Designation Notes | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1959 | — | 609,715,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | First year of Memorial reverse. Common in all grades. |
1959 | D | 1,279,760,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | Common date with strong luster in RD grades. |
1960 | — | 586,405,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | Issued in both Small and Large Date types. |
1960 | D | 1,580,884,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | Small Date D variety is key; RD MS67 SD: ~$250+. |
1960 | — | 1,691,602 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | Proof only from Philadelphia. |
1961 | — | 753,345,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | Common date; clean RD coins readily available. |
1961 | D | 1,753,266,700 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | Very high mintage; watch for minor RPMs. |
1961 | — | 3,028,244 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | Brilliant mirror finish; no major varieties. |
1962 | — | 606,045,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | Common; some show strong die strikes. |
1962 | D | 1,793,148,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | Common; RPM varieties exist. |
1962 | — | 3,218,019 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | Proof-only issues; deep mirror examples collected. |
1963 | — | 757,345,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | No major varieties; well-struck examples common. |
1963 | D | 1,774,020,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | RPMs and DDOs exist; not common. |
1963 | — | 3,075,645 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | Reflective fields with cameo contrast possible. |
1964 | — | 2,648,575,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | Highest Philadelphia mintage of series. |
1964 | D | 3,799,071,500 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | Massive production; many RPMs noted. |
1964 | — | 3,950,762 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | Brilliant proofs; several cameo examples exist. |
1965 | SMS | 2,360,000 (est.) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | SMS MS66 RD: ~$40 | Special Strike (SMS); no proofs minted this year. |
1966 | SMS | 2,261,583 (est.) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | SMS MS66 RD: ~$40 | SMS coins have satin finish; collected widely. |
1967 | SMS | 1,863,344 (est.) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | SMS MS66 RD: ~$40 | SMS coins only; mirror-like but not proof. |
1968 | — | 1,707,880,970 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | Proofs resume at San Francisco. |
1968 | D | 2,886,942,571 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | One of the largest mintages ever. |
1968 | S | 258,270,001 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$45 | Mintages lower than D; some light cameo strikes. |
1968 | S | 3,041,506 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | First S-mint proof in the Memorial series. |
1969 | — | 1,136,910,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | Common; some doubling seen under magnification. |
1969 | D | 4,002,832,200 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | Extremely high mintage. |
1969 | S | 544,375,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$50 | Known for the rare 1969-S DDO variety. |
1969 | S | 2,934,631 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | Sharp details; PR68 examples can reach $50+. |
1970 | — | 1,898,315,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | Large and Small Date varieties exist. |
1970 | D | 2,891,438,900 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | Common; some RPM varieties. |
1970 | S | 690,560,004 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$50 | 1970-S Small Date is a key variety. |
1970 | S | 2,632,810 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | Proof-only issue from San Francisco. |
1971 | — | 1,919,490,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | No major varieties. |
1971 | D | 2,911,045,600 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | RPM and minor DDOs exist. |
1971 | S | 525,133,459 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$50 | Known for a dramatic DDO variety. |
1971 | S | 3,220,733 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | Common proof with mirrored fields. |
1972 | — | 2,933,255,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | 1972 DDO FS-101 is a top variety. |
1972 | D | 2,665,071,200 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | Typical high-mintage strike. |
1972 | S | 376,939,108 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$50 | Prooflike strikes in higher MS. |
1972 | S | 3,260,996 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | DDO varieties also found in proofs. |
1973 | — | 3,728,245,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | No major varieties. |
1973 | D | 3,549,576,588 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | High mintage; RPMs reported. |
1973 | S | 319,937,634 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$50 | Attractive strike and color. |
1973 | S | 2,760,339 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | Mirror fields; no major varieties. |
1974 | — | 4,232,140,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | Extremely common. |
1974 | D | 4,235,098,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | 1974-D Aluminum cent trial exists but not legal to own. |
1974 | S | 412,039,228 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$50 | Sharp RD examples collected. |
1974 | S | 2,612,568 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | Common; clean mirror surfaces. |
1975 | — | 5,451,476,142 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | Very high mintage. |
1975 | D | 4,505,275,300 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | Common date; high-quality RD pieces easily found. |
1975 | S | 2,845,450 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | No S-mint business strikes this year. |
1976 | — | 4,674,292,426 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | No major varieties. |
1976 | D | 4,221,592,455 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | RPMs and DDOs exist. |
1976 | S | 4,149,730 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | High mintage proof; mirror fields common. |
1977 | — | 4,469,930,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | Common; no varieties of note. |
1977 | D | 4,194,062,300 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | Very high mintage. |
1977 | S | 3,251,152 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | Clean, well-struck proofs. |
1978 | — | 5,558,605,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$35 | Extremely common. |
1978 | D | 4,280,233,400 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$40 | High luster examples in RD available. |
1978 | S | 3,127,781 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$25 | No major varieties. |
1979 | — | 6,018,515,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | First year of SBA dollar; no major varieties. |
1979 | D | 4,139,357,254 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | DDO and RPM examples exist. |
1979 | S | 2,543,041 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Clear S and Filled S varieties distinguishable. |
1980 | — | 7,414,705,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | High mintage, common. |
1980 | D | 5,140,866,866 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | RPM exists; otherwise typical strike. |
1980 | S | 3,554,806 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Mirror finish; some cameo contrast. |
1981 | — | 7,491,750,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Abundant; minor DDOs seen. |
1981 | D | 5,373,235,677 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | RPMs seen occasionally. |
1981 | S | 4,063,083 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Type 1 and Type 2 S mint marks distinguish value. |
1982 | — | 10,712,525,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Multiple varieties: large/small date, zinc/copper. |
1982 | D | 6,012,979,368 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | 1982-D Small Date copper rare and valuable. |
1982 | S | 3,857,479 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Copper composition; many brilliant examples. |
1983 | — | 7,752,355,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | 1983 DDR is major variety, FS-801. |
1983 | D | 6,467,199,428 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | Some minor RPMs found. |
1983 | S | 3,279,126 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Excellent cameo contrast. |
1984 | — | 6,357,060,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | 1984 DDO (FS-101) is a top collectible. |
1984 | D | 5,569,238,906 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | Normal strike; some light DDOs noted. |
1984 | S | 3,065,110 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | High contrast examples popular. |
1985 | — | 5,648,489,887 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | No major varieties. |
1985 | D | 5,287,399,926 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | Consistent strike; typical circulation marks. |
1985 | S | 3,362,821 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Deep mirror cameo common. |
1986 | — | 4,491,395,493 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Usual wear patterns; many RD examples. |
1986 | D | 4,442,866,698 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | Common date. |
1986 | S | 3,010,497 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Richly mirrored surfaces. |
1987 | — | 4,879,389,514 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | No major errors. |
1987 | D | 4,879,389,514 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | Typical business strike. |
1987 | S | 4,227,728 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | High polish, cameo fields. |
1988 | — | 6,293,760,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Transitional Reverse (1988 RDV-006) is key. |
1988 | D | 5,253,740,443 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | Transitional Reverse also exists for D. |
1988 | S | 3,262,948 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Popular proof issues. |
1989 | — | 7,261,535,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Regular strike; plentiful. |
1989 | D | 5,345,467,111 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | No major RPMs or DDOs. |
1989 | S | 3,220,194 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Deep cameo surfaces. |
1990 | — | 6,851,765,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Regular strike. |
1990 | D | 4,922,894,533 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | No major varieties. |
1990 | S | 3,299,559 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | 1990 No S is a key modern proof rarity. |
1991 | — | 5,165,940,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Normal business strike. |
1991 | D | 4,158,442,076 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | High quality seen in RD examples. |
1991 | S | 2,867,787 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Brilliant field contrast. |
1992 | — | 4,648,905,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | 1992 Close AM is a highly sought-after variety. |
1992 | D | 4,448,673,300 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | 1992-D Close AM also exists. |
1992 | S | 2,858,981 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Some mirror proofs show heavy contrast. |
1993 | — | 5,684,705,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Regular strike. |
1993 | D | 6,426,650,571 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | RPM exists, not common. |
1993 | S | 2,633,561 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Strong cameo contrast in many proofs. |
1994 | — | 6,500,850,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | No major varieties. |
1994 | D | 7,131,765,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | Normal wear, some BU examples found. |
1994 | S | 2,484,594 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Mirror-like fields. |
1995 | — | 6,411,440,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | 1995 DDO FS-101 is collectible. |
1995 | D | 7,128,560,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | Typical strike. |
1995 | S | 2,797,481 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Strong mirror and cameo features. |
1996 | — | 6,612,565,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | No major varieties. |
1996 | D | 6,509,435,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | RPMs very scarce. |
1996 | S | 2,525,407 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Mirror-like finish. |
1997 | — | 4,622,875,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Common modern issue. |
1997 | D | 4,576,555,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | Usual circulation marks. |
1997 | S | 2,055,000 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Popular among proof set collectors. |
1998 | — | 5,032,155,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | 1998 Wide AM is a top modern variety. |
1998 | D | 5,225,353,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | Regular strike. |
1998 | S | 2,086,507 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Wide and Close AM exist. |
1999 | — | 5,237,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | 1999 Wide AM is highly desirable. |
1999 | D | 6,360,065,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$30 | Common, but check for Wide AM. |
1999 | S | 3,347,966 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Wide AM exists in some proofs. |
2000 | — | 5,503,200,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | 2000 Wide AM is a notable variety. |
2000 | D | 8,774,220,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | No major varieties noted. |
2000 | S | 4,047,993 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Strong cameo examples common. |
2001 | — | 4,959,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | No major varieties. |
2001 | D | 5,374,990,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Typical strike. |
2001 | S | 3,184,606 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | High cameo contrast. |
2002 | — | 3,260,800,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | No major varieties. |
2002 | D | 4,028,055,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Common modern issue. |
2002 | S | 3,211,995 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Bold devices, sharp mirrors. |
2003 | — | 3,300,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | No major varieties. |
2003 | D | 3,548,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Standard Denver issue. |
2003 | S | 3,298,439 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Typical strong strikes. |
2004 | — | 3,379,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | No major varieties. |
2004 | D | 3,456,400,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Clean, modern strike. |
2004 | S | 2,965,422 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Strong cameo contrast. |
2005 | — | 3,935,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Known for sharp dies. |
2005 | D | 3,764,450,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Common strike. |
2005 | S | 3,344,679 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Strong cameo; minimal flaws. |
2006 | — | 4,290,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | No major varieties. |
2006 | D | 3,944,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Regular Denver strike. |
2006 | S | 3,054,436 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | High quality production. |
2007 | — | 3,762,400,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Common issue. |
2007 | D | 3,638,800,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | Standard strike. |
2007 | S | 2,577,166 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | No major flaws. |
2008 | — | 2,569,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Final Memorial reverse. |
2008 | D | 2,849,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$25 | No major varieties. |
2008 | S | 2,169,561 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | End of Memorial design. |
2009 (Birth & Early Childhood) | — | 284,400,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | Log cabin reverse. |
2009 (Birth & Early Childhood) | D | 350,400,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Common variety. |
2009 (Formative Years) | — | 376,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.25 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | Lincoln reading book. Minor DDR exists. |
2009 (Formative Years) | D | 363,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.25 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Several DDR varieties. |
2009 (Professional Life) | — | 316,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.25 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | Lincoln in Illinois. |
2009 (Professional Life) | D | 336,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.25 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Multiple minor errors reported. |
2009 (Presidency) | — | 129,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.25 | $1.25 | RD MS66: ~$18 | U.S. Capitol dome reverse. Slightly lower mintage. |
2009 (Presidency) | D | 198,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.25 | $1.25 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Slight premium for RD. |
2009 | S | 2,995,615 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$20 | Includes all 4 reverse types in proof. |
2010 | — | 1,963,630,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | First Shield cent. |
2010 | D | 2,519,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | DDR exists in Shield design. |
2010 | S | 1,689,989 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Strong cameo contrast. |
2011 | — | 2,919,200,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | Common date. |
2011 | D | 2,509,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Several minor DDRs exist. |
2011 | S | 1,673,010 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Deep cameo strike. |
2012 | — | 2,968,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | Business strike. |
2012 | D | 2,794,800,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | DDO examples seen. |
2012 | S | 1,278,612 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Mirror finish. |
2013 | — | 3,750,400,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | High mintage. |
2013 | D | 3,300,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Well-struck examples found. |
2013 | S | 1,171,717 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Deep cameo examples common. |
2014 | — | 3,988,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | DDR listings known. |
2014 | D | 4,147,200,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | No major varieties. |
2014 | S | 1,204,011 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Mirror finish. |
2015 | — | 4,166,800,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | DDR coins reported. |
2015 | D | 4,463,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Slight strike doubling. |
2015 | S | 979,880 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Strong strike. |
2016 | — | 4,610,400,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | Shield design. |
2016 | D | 4,509,200,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Common date. |
2016 | S | 890,267 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Reflective cameo fields. |
2017 | — | 4,361,200,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | Slight increase in errors. |
2017 | D | 4,454,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Noted DDOs. |
2017 | S | 934,822 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | High strike clarity. |
2018 | — | 4,301,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | Minor DDO exists. |
2018 | D | 5,300,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | DDO eye/lip doubling. |
2018 | S | 940,132 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Deep cameo mirror finish. |
2019 | — | 3,542,800,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | WDDO-001 nose/eye doubling. |
2019 | D | 3,497,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Strong shield strike. |
2019 | S | 905,096 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Deep cameo proof. |
2020 | — | 4,000,800,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | DDO FS-101, strong doubling. |
2020 | D | 3,565,800,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | No major varieties noted. |
2020 | S | 678,420 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Low proof mintage. |
2021 | — | 4,300,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | DDR shield doubling reported. |
2021 | D | 4,369,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Sharp strike. |
2021 | S | 466,294 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Scarce proof strike. |
2022 | — | 4,297,600,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | Minor shield doubling. |
2022 | D | 4,382,200,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Shield reverse consistent. |
2022 | S | 291,576 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Very low mintage. |
2023 | — | 4,296,800,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | New dies introduced. |
2023 | D | 4,480,000,000 | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Strong design features. |
2023 | S | 283,790 (Proof) | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Modern ultra-cameo. |
2024 | — | TBD | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | Preliminary strike data. |
2024 | D | TBD | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | New shield updates. |
2024 | S | TBD | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Projected mintage. |
2025 | — | TBD | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$15 | To be determined. |
2025 | D | TBD | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.15 | $0.20 | $1.00 | RD MS66: ~$20 | Awaiting data. |
2025 | S | TBD | — | — | — | — | $2.00 | PR67 RD: ~$18 | Final proof pending. |
Full Bands (FB) Designation
While “Full Bands” (FB) is a designation commonly associated with Mercury and Roosevelt dimes (referring to full separation of the horizontal bands on the fasces), Lincoln cents use a similar quality designation known as Full Steps (FS) for Jefferson nickels or Full Red (RD) designations for cents. However, some collectors and graders refer to high-definition strike features such as:
FS (Full Strike): A term sometimes used for cents showing complete detail in Lincoln’s hair and beard.
RD (Red): Indicates the coin has maintained 95% or more of its original red copper color.
RB (Red-Brown): 5–95% red surfaces.
BN (Brown): Less than 5% red surface color.
Lincoln Penny Price Guide
Key Dates, Notable Varieties, and Errors
1909-S VDB – Key Date, Rare. High collector demand.
1922 No D – Major error. Missing mint mark, extremely rare.
1943 Steel Cents – Special wartime issue with a steel composition.
1955 Doubled Die Obverse – Major error, doubling on the obverse.
1972 Doubled Die Obverse – Well-known for noticeable doubling.
2009 Lincoln Bicentennial Series – Special series, including various reverse designs.
1969 S Doubled Die Obverse – Extreme doubling on motif and date. Many exhibit heavy doubling on depiction of Lincoln in some cases.
Lincoln Penny Price Guide
Historical Context by Year
1909 – First year of Wheat Cent; honors Abraham Lincoln’s 100th birthday.
1910 – Progressive Era reforms continue; Lincoln cent gains popularity.
1911 – Economic growth; Lincoln cent becomes a fixture in circulation.
1912 – Titanic sinks; U.S. continues industrial expansion.
1913 – Federal Reserve established; Buffalo Nickel introduced.
1914 – World War I begins in Europe; U.S. maintains neutrality.
1915 – War drives demand for raw materials; coin production rises.
1916 – Preparedness Movement grows; Mercury Dime debuts.
1917 – U.S. enters WWI; coin hoarding increases.
1918 – War ends; influenza pandemic affects economy and labor.
1919 – Treaty of Versailles signed; post-war inflation begins.
1920 – Prohibition begins; economic boom starts.
1921 – Depression hits post-WWI economy; Peace Dollar introduced.
1922 – No cents minted at Philadelphia due to production focus on silver.
1923 – Roaring Twenties in full swing; consumerism on the rise.
1924 – Coolidge presidency stabilizes economy.
1925 – Mount Rushmore construction begins.
1926 – Air travel expands; coin designs remain unchanged.
1927 – Charles Lindbergh flies solo across the Atlantic.
1928 – Economic optimism peaking; stock market surges.
1929 – Stock Market Crash triggers the Great Depression.
1930 – Widespread unemployment; coin mintage declines.
1931 – Economic hardship persists; fewer coins needed.
1932 – Washington Quarter debuts; cent remains largely unchanged.
1933 – Roosevelt’s New Deal begins; gold recalled by the U.S. government.
1934 – Recovery efforts continue; increased infrastructure investment.
1935 – Social Security Act passed; safety nets form.
1936 – FDR re-elected; commemorative coins issued.
1937 – Economic recession within the Depression.
1938 – Jefferson Nickel introduced; Wheat Cent retains design.
1939 – WWII begins in Europe; U.S. remains neutral.
1940 – Arsenal of Democracy takes shape; coin metals prioritized.
1941 – Pearl Harbor attacked; U.S. enters WWII.
1942 – Composition changes begin in coinage due to wartime needs.
1943 – Steel cents issued to conserve copper for the war.
1944 – Return to copper alloy; steel cents discontinued.
1945 – WWII ends; postwar economic boom begins.
1946 – Baby Boom era starts; cent remains unchanged.
1947 – Cold War tensions rise; consumer confidence returns.
1948 – Marshall Plan aids Europe; economic growth continues.
1949 – NATO formed; Red Scare begins.
1950 – Korean War begins; coin collecting gains popularity.
1951 – Defense spending increases; economic expansion continues.
1952 – Eisenhower elected president; prosperity grows.
1953 – Korean War ends; peace brings domestic focus.
1954 – Civil Rights Movement gains momentum.
1955 – Famous doubled-die cent struck in Philadelphia.
1956 – “In God We Trust” becomes national motto.
1957 – U.S. adds motto to paper currency; coin demand remains high.
1958 – Final year of Wheat Cent; ends a near 50-year legacy.
1959: First year of the Lincoln Memorial reverse, replacing the Wheat Ears design; marks the 150th anniversary of Lincoln’s birth.
1960: Featured both small and large date varieties in Philadelphia and Denver mints; these subtle design differences created collectible interest.
1961: No major design changes; large mintages supported growing U.S. commerce during a period of economic expansion.
1962: Coin shortages led to increased production; no proof coins were struck this year.
1963: High mintages and solid copper composition continued; struck during JFK’s presidency, just before his assassination.
1964: Huge mintage year due to coin shortages; mint marks were temporarily removed from nickels and dimes, but not cents.
1965: Mint stopped using mint marks temporarily (1965–1967) to discourage coin hoarding.
1966: No mint marks; mint continued to ramp up production to address widespread coin shortages.
1967: Still no mint marks; special mint sets (SMS) replaced proof sets for collectors.
1968: mint marks returned; proof production moved to San Francisco Mint.
1969: Known for the controversial and rare 1969-S doubled die obverse variety; a top-tier Lincoln cent rarity.
1970: Last year of the small date/large date variety from San Francisco; another popular collector variation.
1971: High mintage year; continued use of the bronze composition.
1972: Notable for strong doubled die obverse variety (Class I); one of the most famous Lincoln cent errors.
1973: No major varieties; bronze composition continued.
1974: Experimental aluminum cents were struck but never released; most were destroyed, with a few rumored survivors.
1975: Continued high mintages; no major varieties, but the cent remained critical to U.S. commerce.
1976: U.S. Bicentennial year, though Lincoln cent design remained unchanged unlike quarters, halves, and dollars.
1977: Steady production with no significant varieties; cent remained in bronze alloy.
1978: Last year before major changes to cent composition; some collectors note strong strikes and clean designs this year.
1979: Final full year of bronze alloy cents before 1982 shift to copper-plated zinc was considered.
1980: mint marks were now added by machine rather than by hand; subtle design refinements occurred.
1981: Last full year before major compositional change; 1982 marked a turning point.
1982: Transition year from bronze to copper-plated zinc cents; included seven different varieties with large/small dates and two compositions.
1983: First full year of zinc cents; 1983 doubled die reverse became one of the most sought-after post-1980 varieties.
1984: Known for the 1984 doubled ear variety; minor design flaw led to collectible status.
1985: No major varieties; zinc cents continued regular production.
1986: Minor strike improvements; coins showed smoother, more refined profiles of Lincoln.
1987: High production year; widespread use and low collector interest overall.
1988: Known for transitional reverse varieties where remnants of a “VDB” designer’s initials appear faintly.
1989: Updated reverse design with clearer details; “VDB” initials more prominent beneath Lincoln Memorial.
1990: No major varieties; marked a return to consistent quality control after prior transitional issues.
1991: Proof cent showed clearer strike differences compared to business strikes; minting technology improved.
1992: Known for rare “Close AM” variety in both Philadelphia and Denver issues, caused by proof reverse dies on business strikes.
1993: Design and minting quality stabilized; no major varieties, but production remained high.
1994: Notable for high strike quality in proof issues; circulation strikes showed typical zinc weakness.
1995: Known for the 1995 doubled die obverse; a popular error with clearly doubled “LIBERTY” and “IN GOD WE TRUST.”
1996: No major varieties; steady production continued.
1997: Known for strong strikes and clear designs, especially in proof issues.
1998: First year of “Wide AM” reverse in proof dies accidentally used on business strikes; created a new collectible variety.
1999: Continued “Wide AM” reverse error in business strikes; also saw a rare close AM in proof strikes.
2000: Final year with documented “Wide AM” variety; mint quality began modern improvements.
2001: No major varieties; transitional period before upcoming design changes.
2002: Stable mintage year with no key varieties or changes.
2003: Continued use of copper-plated zinc; standard memorial design with declining mintage.
2004: Preceding year of Lincoln bicentennial design planning; regular Memorial reverse continued.
2005: One of the last years of the Memorial design; no notable errors or varieties.
2006: Modernized minting processes improved strike quality and coin consistency.
2007: Final full year before bicentennial redesign planning was finalized.
2008: Last year of the Lincoln Memorial reverse after nearly 50 years.
2009: Lincoln Bicentennial cents released with four reverse designs: Birth and Early Childhood, Formative Years, Professional Life, and Presidency.
2010: New Shield reverse introduced to represent Lincoln’s preservation of the Union; start of current reverse design.
2011: Shield reverse continued; steady production and improved strike quality.
2012: Mint continued strong production of shield reverse; coins saw widespread circulation.
2013: High-quality strikes; no notable varieties, but demand from collectors remained strong.
2014: Proof cents received attention for deep cameo contrast; no major business strike errors reported.
2015: Philadelphia Mint added subtle detail refinements to Lincoln’s portrait.
2016: Continued use of shield design; minting technology improved die longevity and clarity.
2017: Denver cents with no mint mark caused collector confusion due to a few error strikes.
2018: Proof and special strike coins showed high contrast; no major collectible business strike varieties.
2019: Lincoln cent marked its 110th anniversary; special West Point cents (W mint mark) included in proof sets for collectors.
2020: COVID-19 pandemic affected mint operations; coin shortage made circulation cents harder to find.
2021: Continued coin shortages led to increased production; coins often found in uncirculated condition from rolls.
2022: High mintage year due to pandemic aftermath; shield design persisted with no major varieties.
2023: Rising interest in small die differences; collectors examined shield design details more closely.
2024: Mint focused on maintaining coin production amid economic uncertainty; no official design changes, but die polish lines and minor DDRs circulated.
2025: Current shield design continues; speculation about future design changes grows as Lincoln cent approaches potential discontinuation discussion.
Final Thoughts
The Lincoln Cent is more than just a coin—it’s a living timeline of American history, pressed in copper and zinc. As one of the longest-running coin series in U.S. history, it reflects shifts in metal composition, wartime scarcity, design innovation, and cultural milestones, all wrapped into a small, everyday object.
For new collectors, it offers an affordable and thrilling gateway: a chance to uncover doubled dies, off-center strikes, or transitional planchets in pocket change or rolls. For seasoned numismatists, it presents an endless puzzle of mint marks, varieties, die states, and condition rarities that reward patience and precision.